From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12522 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2011 20:44:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 12514 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2011 20:44:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:44:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1FKiPrM026190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:44:25 -0500 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1FKiNwh024944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:44:24 -0500 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1FKiMBg017709; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:44:22 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p1FKiLjw017707; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:44:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:02:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [unavailable values part 1, 03/17] expose list of available ranges to common code Message-ID: <20110215204421.GA17644@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <201102071429.19096.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201102141939.10946.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110214211223.GA9425@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201102151859.03901.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201102151859.03901.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00340.txt.bz2 On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:59:03 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > As for what type for use then instead of CORE_ADDR, we traditionaly > use LONGEST/ULONGEST throughout, AFAICS. I guess nobody ever saw > a real need to come up with a special type for it. OK, I understand and agree with the difference now, thanks for the explanation. I will try to introduce some CORE_SIZE_T or similar type when my future patches need it. Thanks, Jan