From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: deprecated_throw_reason? (was Re: New ARI warning Tue Jan 25 01:55:01 UTC 2011)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110124221053.1f12ee32@mesquite.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110125015501.GA4054@sourceware.org>
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 01:55:01 +0000
GDB Administrator <gdbadmin@sourceware.org> wrote:
> > gdb/remote-mips.c:513: deprecated: deprecated throw_reason: Do not use deprecated throw_reason, see declaration for details
> gdb/remote-mips.c:513: deprecated_throw_reason (RETURN_ERROR);
[...]
> > gdb/remote-mips.c:2285: deprecated: deprecated throw_reason: Do not use deprecated throw_reason, see declaration for details
> gdb/remote-mips.c:2285: deprecated_throw_reason (RETURN_QUIT);
Does anyone know how these uses of deprecated_throw_reason should
be fixed?
I've looked at the comment before the declaration of
deprecated_throw_reason(). It reads as follows:
/* Instead of deprecated_throw_reason, code should use catch_exception
and throw_exception. */
extern void deprecated_throw_reason (enum return_reason reason)
ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN;
This sort of makes sense, except that the code in question just
wants to do a throw. I suppose I could try to inline the relevant
bits from the definition of deprecated_throw_reason(), but that
seems ugly.
I've also looked at the patch where throw_reason() was deprecated.
See:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-01/msg00199.html
It's interesting to note that with the exception of a use of
deprecated_throw_reason() in breakpoint.c, all other uses (where
the files still exist) are still in the gdb sources today.
I've also looked at the definition of deprecated_throw_reason(). It
seems to me that it's a convenient wrapper for throw_exception(). I'm
wondering if deprecated_throw_reason() ought not to have been
deprecated? (Note that Eli objected to the patch which performed the
deprecation precisely because no example was given as to how to
perform the conversions - well, at least that's my reading of it.)
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-25 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 2:06 New ARI warning Tue Jan 25 01:55:01 UTC 2011 GDB Administrator
2011-01-25 8:42 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2011-01-25 8:51 ` deprecated_throw_reason? (was Re: New ARI warning Tue Jan 25 01:55:01 UTC 2011) Andrew Burgess
2011-01-25 9:50 ` Andrew Burgess
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110124221053.1f12ee32@mesquite.lan \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox