From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3914 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2011 12:47:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 3904 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2011 12:47:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:47:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C529A2BAC74; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:47:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6slOASbSEJIk; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:47:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45D92BAC6F; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:47:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F7041459AD; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:47:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:41:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [commit/hpux] delete hpux_pid_to_str (unused) Message-ID: <20110114124721.GO2504@adacore.com> References: <1294963328-25384-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <201101141100.p0EB0C2Q003814@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <201101141230.30669.alves.ped@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201101141230.30669.alves.ped@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 > > Hmm, actually I think hpux-thread.c is only relevant for the userland > > threads (DCE) implementation that was available as an add-on to HP-UX > > 10.x. In that context, the hpux_pid_to_str() function makes a little > > bit more sense that the default. > > > > However, I think hpux-thread.c can be considered to be dead. The > > HP-UX 10.20 systems I have access don't have the DCE stuff installed > > on them, so I've never actually tested it. I vaguely remember that > > the code doesn't even compile on machines that have the DCE stuff > > installed. > > > > Any objections if I kill it? Not from me either. We also had a discussion a few weeks ago with Pierre, where it was suggested that we stop supporting version 10.x. You're the only one I know who still has access to such a system (and I didn't know it until now). -- Joel