From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-77653-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27451 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2011 11:00:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 27442 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2011 11:00:38 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:00:34 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0EB0FjH026449;	Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:00:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id p0EB0C2Q003814;	Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:00:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:30:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201101141100.p0EB0C2Q003814@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com
In-reply-to: <1294963328-25384-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com>	(message from Joel Brobecker on Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:02:08 -0500)
Subject: Re: [commit/hpux] delete hpux_pid_to_str (unused)
References:  <1294963328-25384-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00321.txt.bz2

> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:02:08 -0500
> 
> This is something that Tom noticed, and told me about by email.
> 
> This function is unused, and the default formatting routine does
> just fine, I think.   On pa-hpux:
> 
>         [New process 12565, lwp 2513]
>         [New process 12565, lwp 2514]

Hmm, actually I think hpux-thread.c is only relevant for the userland
threads (DCE) implementation that was available as an add-on to HP-UX
10.x.  In that context, the hpux_pid_to_str() function makes a little
bit more sense that the default.

However, I think hpux-thread.c can be considered to be dead.  The
HP-UX 10.20 systems I have access don't have the DCE stuff installed
on them, so I've never actually tested it.  I vaguely remember that
the code doesn't even compile on machines that have the DCE stuff
installed.

Any objections if I kill it?