From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1026 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2011 23:37:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1018 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2011 23:37:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:36:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058C12BAC4D; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:36:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 64pC5Lz9j+CQ; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:36:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87FE2BAC4C; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:36:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ED5841459AD; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:36:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:02:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Keith Seitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.2.1 release status? Message-ID: <20110113233653.GM2504@adacore.com> References: <20110113160428.GT4302@adacore.com> <4D2F57F1.2060000@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D2F57F1.2060000@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00316.txt.bz2 Thanks for the update! > > [RFA] c++/11734 revisited > > > >(or is it: `[RFA] c++/12273'). > > Last time this was brought up (in December), 11734 was the critical > one, but 12273 might rear its ugly head if it is left out. It's a > pretty innocuous patch (or is regression-free, at least). > > >Do we know whether we expect to see them fixed soon? > > Those are both pending review since 14-12-2010. Any C++ expert that we could gently nudge ;-)? It'd be nice to get the 7.2.1 release out sooner rather than later... -- Joel