From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9306 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2011 23:16:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 9296 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2011 23:16:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:16:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB622BABE2; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:16:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6KFlz1Am3-iR; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:16:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAE72BABB0; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:16:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D20BA1459AD; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 18:16:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 01:01:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Steve Ellcey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] port GDB to ia64-hpux (native). Message-ID: <20110112231604.GI2504@adacore.com> References: <1293511386-7384-7-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <201101112314.p0BNErd19061@lucas.cup.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201101112314.p0BNErd19061@lucas.cup.hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 I'm doing the final checks before committing the corrected version. But something caught my attention: > I then ran the testsuite and here are the base results. > > gdb.base1 results: You are getting considerably more failures than I am. I think they could be explain by 2 factors (but I am only guessing): - I use GNU libunwind (or a modified version of 0.98); That makes a real difference in our case, compared to using the system libunwind. - the 32bit mode might make a difference as well; not sure. -- Joel