From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22485 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2011 23:38:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 22476 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2011 23:38:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:38:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0BNbpDB015124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:37:51 -0500 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-8-67.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.67]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0BNbos2020007; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:37:51 -0500 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 3DB2158122; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:37:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:30:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Doug Evans , Yao Qi , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: duplicated code in gdb and gdbserver Message-ID: <20110111233750.GA13164@redhat.com> References: <4D272FF6.3070402@codesourcery.com> <20110110155413.GE17302@redhat.com> <20110111233507.GD2331@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110111233507.GD2331@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 585 Hi - On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 06:35:07PM -0500, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > And with such a library, I'd make it so that "non-gdb tools" could use > > it too. For example, it would make easier the building of gdbservers > > that need to speak something other than the remote protocol. >=20 > I'm not entirely crazy about the idea of a public API > [...] > What I would much rather see, is something that allows projects to > easily implement the client-side part of the remote protocol. [...] That "something" is exactly what I was talking about: a remote protocol client API. - FChE --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNLOnOVZbdDOm/ZT0RAueRAJ4poOSLFjBcklTSyMT7GxocQZE2sACfQaCB 23IuN9RbEtuM/VRqhYqrqnw= =NPVS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--