From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24752 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2011 15:10:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 24740 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2011 15:10:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:10:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0AF9hdf004660 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:09:43 -0500 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-8-67.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.67]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0AF9gxa031046; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:09:43 -0500 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 2D27558153; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:09:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:10:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Doug Evans , Yao Qi , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: duplicated code in gdb and gdbserver Message-ID: <20110110150942.GD17302@redhat.com> References: <4D272FF6.3070402@codesourcery.com> <20110110140848.GB2331@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110110140848.GB2331@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00187.txt.bz2 Hi - On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 06:08:48PM +0400, Joel Brobecker wrote: > [...] I hope you are not suggesting that we actually do remove > native support and force native support through gdbserver! Over time, that could make sense on some targets, if it turns out that using an external helper process improves capabilities (e.g. multi-target or remote debugging, tracepoints) and doesn't materially impact performance. - FChE