From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24663 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2011 05:17:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 24655 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2011 05:17:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 05:17:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE9E2BABFD; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GXqkmwThI707; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADFA2BABFC; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:17:24 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 829C21459AD; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 09:17:17 +0400 (RET) Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 05:17:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yao Qi Cc: Doug Evans , Stan Shebs , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: duplicated code in gdb and gdbserver Message-ID: <20110108051717.GG2351@adacore.com> References: <4D272FF6.3070402@codesourcery.com> <4D27DB30.4080603@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D27DB30.4080603@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00167.txt.bz2 > Thanks for your pointers and suggestions. Looks like it is not a > small piece of work, and IMO, merging common parts of gdb's > ${target}-nat.c and gdbserver's ${target}-low.c can be a starting > point. I'll write patches for this. I don't know how this fits into the plan, but I think that the wait_for_inferior/handle_inferior_event bits in infrun.c should be shared too. I'm very excited to see someone interested in that project, regardless of the areas that you decide to work on. -- Joel