From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25528 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2011 04:14:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 25520 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2011 04:14:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2011 04:14:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373A92BAC36; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:14:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id h9YcsghzX0pu; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:14:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29E82BAC33; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:14:42 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 618901459AD; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:14:35 +0400 (RET) Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 04:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: New ARI warning Fri Jan 7 01:54:25 UTC 2011 Message-ID: <20110107041435.GF2351@adacore.com> References: <20110107015425.GA12157@sourceware.org> <4D2677E5.5020704@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D2677E5.5020704@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 > Hmmm, these are all files that I touched, but the issues are all > pre-existing. What's going on? Why the new warnings? Pierre can give more details, but the detection mechanism is fairly simple-minded: It compares new reports against the previous report, and if there are positive diffs, it sends it in case it is a new warning. It is worth fixing those, even if they were pre-existing, but it's not a requirement. I try to help (for instance, I did a few yesterday), but my schedule until next Tue is going to be a bit packed... -- Joel