From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8594 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2011 20:37:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 8586 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2011 20:37:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:37:08 +0000 Received: (qmail 2060 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 20:37:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 6 Jan 2011 20:37:06 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running? Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:37:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.33-29-realtime; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Tom Tromey , Marc Khouzam , "'Joel Brobecker'" References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201101062037.04441.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00142.txt.bz2 On Thursday 06 January 2011 20:17:23, Tom Tromey wrote: > Marc> There are other instances of error() being called without it > Marc> from mi-main.c. > > These are all bugs. > I think that these instances are for example errors when a frontend uses the wrong MI command syntax. Have we decided whether these should be translated? Not sure who that helps. If not, maybe we should have a mi_error function, so that the ARI doesn't complain about them. -- Pedro Alves