From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9872 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2011 11:16:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 9862 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jan 2011 11:16:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_XJ,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:16:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p01BGWpb008926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 1 Jan 2011 06:16:32 -0500 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p01BGUUu002055 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 1 Jan 2011 06:16:31 -0500 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p01BGTps021243; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 12:16:29 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p01BGTMl021242; Sat, 1 Jan 2011 12:16:29 +0100 Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:16:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] make info regression on --with-system-readline Message-ID: <20110101111629.GA21199@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20110101011319.GA27139@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <8339pdq8la.fsf@gnu.org> <20110101093815.GA24535@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <83y675osbp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83y675osbp.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 On Sat, 01 Jan 2011 11:02:02 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > "make distclean" _should_ be reliable, since its main raison d'etre is > to allow a clean build after re-configuration. So maybe we should fix > that instead (e.g., it doesn't currently remove GDBvn.texi). If "make distclean" should clean it then it also should not be distributed. And we are back at the point GDB currently cannot do easily `make dist'. > > But even if you do just first configure it is now broken in GDB as the files > > get inappropriately distributed. > > Sorry, I don't follow. Can you describe the scenario in more detail? rm -rf gdb-7.2.50.20101231; tar xjf gdb-7.2.50.20101231.tar.bz2; cd gdb-7.2.50.20101231; patch -p1 I prefer to do with GDBvn.texi what many projects do with config.h: > regenerate it on a temporary file, then use move-if-change to move it > into the real file. Would that resolve your problem? It certainly > resolves mine. OK, going to post it. Thanks, Jan