From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10684 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2010 02:26:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 10663 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Dec 2010 02:26:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:26:05 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13D61B400D; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:26:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: Michael Snyder Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdbserver: start a gitignore Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:19:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37-rc5; KDE/4.5.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Joel Brobecker , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <1292416368-24885-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <4D124727.3070504@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4D124727.3070504@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3616814.Ekqv3QjlSh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012222225.37336.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00417.txt.bz2 --nextPart3616814.Ekqv3QjlSh Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 691 On Wednesday, December 22, 2010 13:44:55 Michael Snyder wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:45:18 +0400 > >> From: Joel Brobecker > >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > >>=20 > >> I'm OK but slightly hesitant to introduce a .gitignore for files that > >> are compilation artifacts, not development artifacts. If we start > >> on that road, the list is possibly quite long. > >=20 > > How long can it be? Something like *.o, *.so, *.exe, and a couple of > > binaries we produce? Is that really a problem? >=20 > *.a, *.la, *.lo.... ... which are already handled in the top level and thus not relevant to gdb- specific gitignore files -mike --nextPart3616814.Ekqv3QjlSh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJNEsExAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBbQoP/2q9P/XySiNdEUikpUsnun4g vGeXcca2Q8b+XU04gundSQsfrlQCydHFGNSWrbjrZvyerJJLZ83iycEXBpYTnztj AIgwNQn6BAIjRWvpvbLusIBKlXkAmQmkQYwS3k0plOsm2GMutmQD1vBga6hTgne3 Qw3T37CPBNqOj7GT2t8OEhqykyP0RXzcla9JWZ9Zw15mn2CdQ4bkY1mdgLbjTnnb vbkaMrcM29vpBW2DC3R/bdjTozh7KDB1JquWhTGGJcA29i9FtBFhJwIp4691sseS MQZXmFZIQmwplyaH2pMIcWbM9peEDbqKoQeqA/e9W5pTvmjh7nLQpt/YkNigVjsL NXz1WoK1VlU32HWQ9MmvncPwmBZ99ntgL+I1WR0FPjz5TmB0fqGlk+MWny/ooaPe xUc8WIUjEhaZ46XG/zuoweBLO4arVc2RfY8NrVd4YpoUh8D4XbyHPO2/z0MyXg5s cxjviJPnv8Vr4sNpx9/krn/DZtOmBzOkm8s/qhKuWtip0jXm891pE7lXsQlg3wnM FLORJp/x19EhQdFny0guL34+4ibnVRQKTI8LbnvG8leqTCepq6JOgJFgfabN/n1R X9v1yBhQjl5i5yNtbAKbvkMt6Bh3PCL8+Yop1nbYBVdQY673FjQblXjLyYp9cRIt os4pKWnsHgaqADIt+yTL =EJ8f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3616814.Ekqv3QjlSh--