On Wednesday, December 22, 2010 13:44:55 Michael Snyder wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:45:18 +0400 > >> From: Joel Brobecker > >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > >> > >> I'm OK but slightly hesitant to introduce a .gitignore for files that > >> are compilation artifacts, not development artifacts. If we start > >> on that road, the list is possibly quite long. > > > > How long can it be? Something like *.o, *.so, *.exe, and a couple of > > binaries we produce? Is that really a problem? > > *.a, *.la, *.lo.... ... which are already handled in the top level and thus not relevant to gdb- specific gitignore files -mike