From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1841 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2010 18:17:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 1822 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Dec 2010 18:17:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:17:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 14707 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 18:17:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 22 Dec 2010 18:17:19 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running? Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:45:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.33-29-realtime; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Marc Khouzam , "'Tom Tromey'" References: <201012221210.30198.pedro@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012221817.17271.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00410.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 22 December 2010 18:11:45, Marc Khouzam wrote: > > > If it is ok, please let me know if you want it only in HEAD or > > > also in 7_2. > > > > "running inferior" will sound a bit odd for cores, but, > > since I don't have a better suggestion that wouldn't involve > > more coding, this is okay with me (HEAD and 7_2). > > Would "Can not remove a an active inferior." be better? Fine with me. -- Pedro Alves