From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13077 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2010 18:37:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 12991 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Nov 2010 18:37:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:37:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185C02BABA1; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:37:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id O3nuKeGI0uz8; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:37:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C627E2BAB7D; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:37:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD3001457E1; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:37:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:37:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Implement support for PowerPC BookE masked and ranged watchpoints Message-ID: <20101122183716.GS2634@adacore.com> References: <83wrp05f2f.fsf@gnu.org> <1288648026.3377.7.camel@hactar> <83d3qo5qkj.fsf@gnu.org> <1288905125.14606.4.camel@hactar> <20101116040116.GA19243@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <1290196508.5540.101.camel@hactar> <20101119234530.GL2634@adacore.com> <1290445473.3164.1.camel@hactar> <20101122173830.GR2634@adacore.com> <20101122174540.GA18165@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101122174540.GA18165@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 > There are already many GDB commands, I do not want to block the patch due to > some additional IMO redundant ones, if other maintainers are fine with it. I personally don't have a strong opinion. It sounds from the previous discussion that it was sort of OK with the new command, even if there were other ways to achieve the same result? -- Joel