From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2998 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2010 22:58:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 2982 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2010 22:58:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:58:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAGMwElx027382 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:58:15 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAGMwB18015120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:58:14 -0500 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAGMw9Hs006615; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:58:09 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oAGMw75v006613; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:58:07 +0100 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 22:58:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Handle absent "/usr/sbin/" in prelink error output. Message-ID: <20101116225807.GA6394@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20101116211114.EAB2A2460AB@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <20101116223618.GB2703@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:44:33 +0100, Doug Evans wrote: > I'm wondering if at least part of the problem is in prelink_{no,yes}. > Is it possible for them to return zero (i.e. "fail") but not trigger a > test failure? e.g. is there a conflation of "feature is present but > not working" with "feature is not present"? Dunno, just a wild guess > at this point. prelink_{no,yes} are pretty short and they only: return 0 => then fail or xfail has been always executed return 1 => then pass has been always executed Regards, Jan