From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23680 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2010 18:10:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 23668 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Nov 2010 18:10:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:10:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA4IA8it022900 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:10:08 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA4IA46s017492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 14:10:08 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA4IA00I008738; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:10:01 +0100 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA4I9uua008737; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:09:56 +0100 Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 18:10:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Ken Werner , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Regression on gdb.ada/null_array.exp [Re: [patch] DW_AT_byte_size for array type entries] Message-ID: <20101104180956.GA8587@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <201010191323.57251.ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <201010192016.05535.ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <201011031522.50715.ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20101103190935.GA8853@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20101103232401.GD2445@adacore.com> <20101104003049.GA26198@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20101104015714.GE2445@adacore.com> <20101104032535.GA17310@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20101104180047.GF2445@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101104180047.GF2445@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 19:00:47 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I don't think we can restore the original (lucky) behavior without > breaking the intent of Ken's patch. OK, so could you XFAIL it? <=gcc-4.4 or the missing ___XA type are both fine IMO. I will do it otherwise. > > BTW local FSF GCC 4.4.x rebuild should also make it IMO reproducible. > > Do the most recent compilers trigger the regresions as well? No. On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:09:35 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: # This patch has a regression, for: # gcc (GCC) 4.4.6 20101103 (prerelease) # # The regression does not happen with: # gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20101103 (experimental) # gcc (GCC) 4.5.2 20101103 (prerelease) Thanks, Jan