Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: gdbserver: Clear regcache if buf is NULL
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010162149.36890.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=BEHZKetmGy10n0G_B4RvbEO53Bw5xDAiQN=0=@mail.gmail.com>

On Saturday 16 October 2010 21:16:37, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, and sorry as for not coming back to this promptly.
> > Hmm, I don't think I have a way to trigger that.
> > So is the registers' value really zero, or should gdb
> > ideally present them as not available (and zero is just a
> > hack)?
> >
> 
> You will see it only on machines with XSAVE and enabled in OS.
> Please see
> 
> 13.6 XSAVE/XRSTOR AND PROCESSOR EXTENDED STATE
> MANAGEMENT
> 
> in
> 
> Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer’s Manual
> Volume 3A: System Programming Guide, Part 1
> 
> Basically values in vector registers may not be valid, depending
> on vector state.

Okay, thanks.  The changes I'm working on would make gdb print
for such registers:

 (gdb) info registers
 ...
 foo-register             *value not available*
 ...

rather than:

 (gdb) info registers
 ...
 foo-register             0x0    0
 ...

Trying to print the register's value will show something
like "$1 = <unavailable>", and using it's value in expression
evaluation to determine a computed expression value, an error
will be reported.

Does that sound good?  Or do you think keep using 0 would
be better in this case?

-- 
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-16 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-03 17:44 H.J. Lu
2010-02-03 17:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-09-29  1:54 ` Pedro Alves
2010-10-01  1:51   ` H.J. Lu
2010-10-16 20:01     ` Pedro Alves
2010-10-16 20:16       ` H.J. Lu
2010-10-16 20:49         ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2010-10-16 22:02           ` H.J. Lu
2010-10-17  8:01             ` Pedro Alves
2010-10-31 13:25           ` Mark Kettenis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201010162149.36890.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox