From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30797 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2010 20:45:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 30784 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2010 20:45:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:45:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 5295 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 20:45:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 8 Oct 2010 20:45:35 -0000 Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:45:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Stan Shebs Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: Re: [RFA] Quiet a tracepoint notification with gdbserver Message-ID: <20101008204531.GT23776@caradoc.them.org> References: <20101008174145.GP23776@caradoc.them.org> <4CAF6865.1060409@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CAF6865.1060409@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:52:21AM -0700, Stan Shebs wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >Since gdbserver now defines trace_timestamp, we get a notice after > >connection. This is confusing if you're not trying to use > >tracepoints. I suggest the attached patch; OK? > > > > It's OK with me. Thanks, checked in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery