Re: New ARI warning Wed Sep 29 01:54:08 UTC 2010

Joel Brobecker
2010-09-29T18:55:49Z

> The ARI suggestion makes no sense. It's the ARI that needs fixing.

That's what I was thinking too.

> My guess is that the intention was to suggest replacing
> read_register() with regcache_read() at.al. (that is, s/memory/register)
> read_register/write_register have been yanked out from the sources
> already few years ago.

That makes sense.

I have modified the ARI script accordingly, and rerun it, in order
to expunge the references to read_memory in the reference report.
The two extra emails we should get shortly from gdbadmin should reflect
these changes.

Thanks,
--
Joel