From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25926 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2010 18:16:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 25917 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2010 18:16:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:16:02 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8PIFbuE028888; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o8PIFZS6001516; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:15:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201009251815.o8PIFZS6001516@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: brobecker@adacore.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com In-reply-to: <1285267549-8523-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:45:49 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFC/commit] Add a sparc simulator with the sparc bareboard target. References: <1285267549-8523-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 > From: Joel Brobecker > Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:45:49 -0700 > > This is something that the RTEMS target already does. I think we should > do that for any bareboard sparc. The simulator might not handle v8 or > v9, I'm not sure, since it is stored in the erc32 subdirectory. But > at least v7 should work, and I am hoping that anyone interested in later > versions of sparc in the simulator should be able to enhance it so. > > gdb/ChangeLog: > > * configure.tgt (sparc-*-*): Set gdb_sim to ../sim/erc32/libsim.a. > > Any objection? In that case, the sparc-*-rtems* case can probably go.