From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11145 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2010 17:32:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 11137 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Sep 2010 17:32:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:32:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246DF2BAC11; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PLDLgiE0FV5Z; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25662BABDF; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6E31DF599F; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:07:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Michael Snyder Cc: Pierre Muller , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [RFC] Improve stabs debugging for mingw64 executables loaded at high addresses Message-ID: <20100914173203.GH3845@adacore.com> References: <000701cb541e$1160cde0$342269a0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <4C8FADBC.70301@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C8FADBC.70301@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00270.txt.bz2 > I don't see any intrinsic harm in it, since it will only affect stabs > binaries when BFD64 is defined. I don't know what the effect might be on the 64bit platforms out there that still use stabs (Eg. alpha-tru64). -- Joel