From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31553 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2010 21:13:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 31542 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2010 21:13:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:13:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7ULDQir019480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:13:26 -0400 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7ULDOON016031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:13:25 -0400 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o7ULDNCI028027; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:13:23 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o7ULDMSn028026; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:13:22 +0200 Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:13:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Mark Kettenis Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t Message-ID: <20100830211322.GA27931@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100830070955.GA6831@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008302050.02945.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100830201110.GA17151@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008302047.o7UKlPYR005898@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201008302047.o7UKlPYR005898@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00540.txt.bz2 On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:47:25 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > That seems rather backwards. If gdbserver works so well, the > linux-nat.c code should be able to work even better. Just due to inevitable multi-host systems (read "cloud"; software is still slower and GHz have their technological limit) the linux-nat.c model (=without a wire protocol) is a history. Thanks, Jan