Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t

Eli Zaretskii
2010-08-30T14:11:52Z

> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:11:00 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> CC: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_02.html
>
> The _t suffix is listed on the last row of the first table on that page.

Right. A strange ruling, I think _t is used in lots of applications.
I also don't really understand the language of the ruling in its last
part:

End in the string indicated as a reserved suffix in the table and do
not use the reserved prefixes posix_, POSIX_, or _POSIX_, as long as
the reserved suffix is in that part of the name considered significant
by the implementation.

I guess we need to start removing those suffixes, but given the amount
of existing code that uses them, I'm not sure Jan's patches should be
blocked because of that.