From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25061 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2010 00:02:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 24908 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Aug 2010 00:02:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:02:46 +0000 Received: (qmail 12944 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2010 00:02:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 27 Aug 2010 00:02:44 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit] [gdbserver/linux] access memory of running processes Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.33-29-realtime; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Michael Snyder References: <201008270026.22929.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4C76F8B8.9050502@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4C76F8B8.9050502@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201008270102.43464.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00454.txt.bz2 On Friday 27 August 2010 00:28:56, Michael Snyder wrote: > Hmmm, don't like "unprepare_to_access_memory". > > What about "finish_accessing_memory"? Hmm, I don't like "finish", since the access has finished already when we call this function. How about "done_accessing_memory"? Any other suggestions/nits? :-) -- Pedro Alves