From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12293 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2010 09:50:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 12284 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2010 09:50:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:50:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928232BAC72; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lM+eouNqOQmx; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:50:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7F42BAC20; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 05:49:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AC609F59B2; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:49:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix setting of VSX registers Message-ID: <20100819094956.GE2903@adacore.com> References: <1279738729.11022.23.camel@hactar> <1282166177.19094.10.camel@hactar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1282166177.19094.10.camel@hactar> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2 > Ok? Also, ok for the branch? [...] > 2010-08-18 Thiago Jung Bauermann > > * gdb.arch/vsx-regs.exp: Remove wrong comment about testing AltiVec > registers. Update data sets with the new v2_double element in the VSX > register union. Add vector_register3_vr data set for the AltiVec > registers. Use gdb_test_no_output instead of send_gdb. Looks good to me, Thiago. OK for both HEAD & branch. -- Joel