From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14213 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2010 19:05:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 14203 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Aug 2010 19:05:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:04:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363702BAC13; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0DykPiDBFfk6; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044D02BAC10; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:04:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2884FF58FA; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:04:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:05:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: Phil Muldoon , gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [patch] Implement post_event for Python scripts. Message-ID: <20100811190447.GA2834@adacore.com> References: <4C45F0B0.5000903@redhat.com> <20100727162956.GG13267@adacore.com> <4C503BFE.8090608@redhat.com> <20100728173128.GM13267@adacore.com> <4C582707.6080101@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 > Phil, please check in what you have. If the documentation is still > insufficient, I think it is fine to fix it up in a separate patch. > Joel, could you comment on that when you find some time? I think that the documentation is just as good as we can make it. I was about to comment that the threaded exammple isn't bringing much compared to the non-threaded one, but then I refrained, because the new example is still fine, and a little diversity does not hurt :). -- Joel