Re: [patch] Fix regression on prelinked executables

Joel Brobecker
2010-07-30T15:55:12Z

> The meaning is reversed. It is !(a || b || c). Which I find more readable
> than (!a && !b && !c). But I will have to change my mind as it seems to not
> everyone may consider my chosen format as more readable.

I just decided to read the condition as "suppress the warning if (a || b)".
That helped mentally absorb it. But I think that's a detail.

> That is the change above reducing the enumerated list in fact
> increases the probability we give a warning.

OK - just wanted to make sure that this was the intent.

> OK to check-in?

Sure.

--
Joel