From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27937 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2010 05:15:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 27926 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2010 05:15:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:15:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6S5F4OU024479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:15:05 -0400 Received: from mesquite.lan ([10.3.113.3]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6S5F3Fa018341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:15:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:15:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rx-sim]: add cycle accuracy Message-ID: <20100727221503.59032690@mesquite.lan> In-Reply-To: <201007280206.o6S26g5e013725@greed.delorie.com> References: <201007280206.o6S26g5e013725@greed.delorie.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00466.txt.bz2 On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:06:42 -0400 DJ Delorie wrote: > There doesn't seem to be an rx-specific sim maintainer. Since I wrote > it, should I be the maintainer? Yes, I think you should be the maintainer for the rx sim. Kevin