From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19460 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2010 13:36:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 19446 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jul 2010 13:36:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:36:47 +0000 Received: (qmail 9078 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2010 13:36:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caradoc.them.org) (dan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 26 Jul 2010 13:36:45 -0000 Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:36:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Subject: Re: RFC: change needs_frame_tls_address Message-ID: <20100726133630.GA18091@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey References: <201007240204.20661.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201007240204.20661.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00393.txt.bz2 On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 02:04:20AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Given that if you have registers, you always have a frame, I don't > think that's a good check. Agreed. Do we need to separate "needs any frame" vs "specific to one frame" if parts of GDB ask both questions? This is the same as a global register variable - which I'm sure GDB messes up too :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery