From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17102 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2010 22:10:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 17093 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jul 2010 22:10:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:10:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6NMAcCR001840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:10:38 -0400 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6NMAZ6s012172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:10:37 -0400 Received: from host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o6NMAZdu006973; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:10:35 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o6NMAYpx006972; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:10:34 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:10:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: New test gdb.dwarf2/dw2-aranges.exp Message-ID: <20100723221034.GA6844@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100723210833.GA12568@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:04:41 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > I don't think we need this, because CVS gdb doesn't read .debug_aranges, > and I don't think we're going to add that. I agree, I should have figured it out. > If we do end up needing that feature in the future, I think we can > easily extract the necessary code from the branch. So, I would > recommend committing this there. It is already on that branch; please ignore this mail thread. Jan