From: Ken Werner <ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>,
"Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Small fix for assigning values to vectors
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007091238.57599.ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100707182610.GK8410@caradoc.them.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1609 bytes --]
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 08:26:10 pm Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 07:50:14PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > Ken Werner wrote:
> > > As can be seen the GDB behaves incorrect for vector types. A quick look
> > > to the valops.c:value_assign function shows that
> > > value_coerce_to_target creates a value with lval set to lval_memory
> > > for array types (including vectors). The code was introduced with the
> > > following patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-
> > > patches/2008-03/msg00079.html. I have to admit that I do not entirely
> > > understand why value_coerce_to_target is called here.
> >
> > Dan, do you recall why you added a value_coerce_to_target for the
> > *destination* of an assignment? It seems this shouldn't really be
> > necessary ...
>
> I'm not sure now. We could try dropping it.
Ok, the attached patch removes coerce_array call as well. Tested on powerpc64-
*-linux-gnu and i686-*-linux-gnu, no regressions.
> > > @@ -1424,6 +1424,9 @@ value_must_coerce_to_target (struct valu
> > >
> > > valtype = check_typedef (value_type (val));
> > >
> > > + if (TYPE_VECTOR (valtype))
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > >
> > > switch (TYPE_CODE (valtype))
> > >
> > > {
> >
> > > case TYPE_CODE_ARRAY:
> > Ken, this doesn't look quite right: the TYPE_VECTOR flag is defined only
> > for TYPE_CODE_ARRAY types; you should never look at TYPE_VECTOR for any
> > other type.
Fixed, thanks.
> > Otherwise, this looks reasonable to me ...
>
> It does seem reasonable that a vector does not have to live in target
> memory.
Regards
-ken
[-- Attachment #2: vec_lval.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2559 bytes --]
Changelog:
2010-07-09 Ken Werner <ken.werner@de.ibm.com>
* valops.c (value_assign): Remove coerce_array call.
(value_must_coerce_to_target): Return 0 in case of TYPE_VECTOR.
testsuite/ChangeLog:
2010-07-09 Ken Werner <ken.werner@de.ibm.com>
* gdb.arch/altivec-abi.exp: New tests.
Index: gdb/valops.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/valops.c,v
retrieving revision 1.248
diff -p -u -r1.248 valops.c
--- gdb/valops.c 28 Jun 2010 20:35:52 -0000 1.248
+++ gdb/valops.c 9 Jul 2010 08:12:16 -0000
@@ -1083,13 +1083,6 @@ value_assign (struct value *toval, struc
toval = value_coerce_to_target (toval);
fromval = value_cast (type, fromval);
}
- else
- {
- /* Coerce arrays and functions to pointers, except for arrays
- which only live in GDB's storage. */
- if (!value_must_coerce_to_target (fromval))
- fromval = coerce_array (fromval);
- }
CHECK_TYPEDEF (type);
@@ -1427,6 +1420,7 @@ value_must_coerce_to_target (struct valu
switch (TYPE_CODE (valtype))
{
case TYPE_CODE_ARRAY:
+ return TYPE_VECTOR (valtype) ? 0 : 1;
case TYPE_CODE_STRING:
return 1;
default:
Index: gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-abi.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-abi.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -r1.19 altivec-abi.exp
--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-abi.exp 2 Jul 2010 18:02:19 -0000 1.19
+++ gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/altivec-abi.exp 6 Jul 2010 12:47:01 -0000
@@ -98,6 +98,16 @@ proc altivec_abi_tests { extra_flags for
gdb_test "p vec_func(vshort_d,vushort_d,vint_d,vuint_d,vchar_d,vuchar_d,vfloat_d,x_d,y_d,a_d,b_d,c_d,intv_on_stack_d)" \
".\[0-9\]+ = .0, 0, 0, 0." "call inferior function with vectors (2)"
+ # Attempt to take address of the return value of vec_func.
+ gdb_test "p &vec_func(vshort,vushort,vint,vuint,vchar,vuchar,vfloat,x,y,a,b,c,intv_on_stack)" \
+ "Attempt to take address of value not located in memory." \
+ "Attempt to take address of the return value of vec_func"
+
+ # Attempt to assing a value to the return value of vec_func.
+ gdb_test "set variable vec_func(vshort,vushort,vint,vuint,vchar,vuchar,vfloat,x,y,a,b,c,intv_on_stack) = {0,1,2,3}" \
+ "Left operand of assignment is not an lvalue." \
+ "Attempt to assing a value to the return value of vec_func"
+
# Let's step into the function, to see if the args are printed correctly.
gdb_test "step" \
$pattern1 \
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-09 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 13:58 Ken Werner
2010-07-07 17:50 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-07 18:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-07-09 10:39 ` Ken Werner [this message]
2010-07-09 13:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-07-09 13:16 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-09 13:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-10 13:04 ` Ken Werner
2010-07-10 15:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2010-07-10 17:05 ` Ken Werner
2010-07-12 14:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2010-07-14 14:55 ` Ken Werner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007091238.57599.ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dan@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox