From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-74081-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5838 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2010 09:12:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 5826 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2010 09:12:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:12:12 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5T9CAnN012698	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:12:10 -0400
Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5T9C8YN009279	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:12:10 -0400
Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o5T9C8xJ030604;	Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:12:08 +0200
Received: (from jkratoch@localhost)	by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o5T9C7r5030603;	Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:12:07 +0200
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:12:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix PR gdb/11702, printing of static const member variables
Message-ID: <20100629091207.GA30541@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
References: <AANLkTinP0PePXRmQzmD4ZvrkyZgLu_S6ADPYAEYF8vQ4@mail.gmail.com> <20100627182442.AF5CA84613@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <20100628110222.GA21051@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <AANLkTilD8Pzc_3o8DebVkYZclyIIKOlApvEHz6zVkDAi@mail.gmail.com> <20100628190959.GA16958@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100628190959.GA16958@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00674.txt.bz2

On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:09:59 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> (c) I guess the (b) rule works even with current GCC output, no special
> compatibility cludge is needed.

for GDB; GCC should stop emitting DW_AT_declaration for better DWARF
correctness (with no other effect) only for DWARF-4+ as it would break
older=current GDBs otherwise.

No patch or testsuite run tried so far.


Regards,
Jan