From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11003 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2010 20:32:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 10994 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2010 20:32:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:32:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7682BACCD; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CBzAgFLrOKSE; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D735E2BACC8; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:32:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 92266F5894; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:32:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Kai Tietz Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [RFA/commit/Win64] Remove new extra leading underscore in symbol name Message-ID: <20100624203216.GK2595@adacore.com> References: <1276813536-31761-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <201006241942.32722.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100624190021.GJ2595@adacore.com> <201006242025.25966.pedro@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00559.txt.bz2 > Yes, by --enable-leading-mingw64-underscores just the default in bfd > is changed. So it could be a work-a-round for supporting binaries > having non-ABI name-decoration. I'm afraid that this is what we're going to have to do. One thing we need to decide on, now, is whether 7.2 should build with the old behavior by default or not. If there hasn't been a GCC release including the ABI change yet, then perhaps it's better for the users if we tweak 7.2 to expect the non-ABI name-decorations. -- Joel