From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20967 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2010 16:59:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 20957 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2010 16:59:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:59:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805172BACA3; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id dpJiX7X7Xjyc; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B318A2BAB04; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:59:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 08AE0F5894; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Hui Zhu Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Pedro Alves , Tom Tromey , stanshebs@earthlink.net, stan@codesourcery.com, msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Let "gcore" command accept a suffix argument Message-ID: <20100623165905.GH2595@adacore.com> References: <20100109105557.GA2007@adacore.com> <20100110054328.GD2007@adacore.com> <20100110140029.GF2007@adacore.com> <83zkyndjx2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2 > 2010-06-23 Hui Zhu > > * printcmd.c (ui_printf): New function. > (printf_command): Call ui_printf. > (_initialize_printcmd): New command "eval". This is OK. > 2010-06-23 Hui Zhu > > * gdb.base/eval.exp: New file. This is also OK. Just for the record, I first thought that your two tests where still the same and thus would generate the same message. But after a closer inspection, one used $a++ and the other ++$a. Why not use something more different like '$a * 2' maybe? Another way to make things different is to specify distinct messages explicitly - for instance "first eval" / "second eval"... -- Joel