From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5699 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2010 21:34:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 5639 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jun 2010 21:34:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:34:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7750D2BABF6; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nduqidUpCGMQ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79922BABD9; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:34:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBD12F58FA; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:34:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Hui Zhu Cc: Stan Shebs , Tom Tromey , Stan Shebs , Michael Snyder , gdb-patches ml , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC] Let "gcore" command accept a suffix argument Message-ID: <20100621213350.GA8327@adacore.com> References: <20100106075757.GF24777@adacore.com> <20100109105557.GA2007@adacore.com> <20100110054328.GD2007@adacore.com> <20100110140029.GF2007@adacore.com> <20100621165714.GC2595@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100621165714.GC2595@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00464.txt.bz2 > > 2010-06-21 Hui Zhu > > > > * printcmd.c (ui_printf_maybe_filtered): New function. > > (printf_command): Call ui_printf_maybe_filtered. > > (_initialize_printcmd): New command "eval". Something that I thought of afterwards: Can you also add a small test for this new command. We should at least verify that a basic case works fine - something like "eval echo [...]"... Thanks, -- Joel