From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12113 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2010 13:00:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 12091 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jun 2010 13:00:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FAKE_REPLY_C,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:59:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5BCxl8G006541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:59:47 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5BCxihm005858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:59:47 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o5BCxi6t030913; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:59:44 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o5BCxhCG030912; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:59:43 +0200 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:00:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Frederic Riss , Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] Clear stale specific locs, not whole bpts [rediff] Message-ID: <20100611125943.GA30860@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201006111150.04054.pedro@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:58:27 +0200, Frederic Riss wrote: > I didn't review the patch, but I tested it and I can confirm that it > fixes the issue and does not regress for me. Thanks for the test. On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:50:03 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Thursday 10 June 2010 21:39:13, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > Is this patch OK? I understand the former Pedro A.'s suggested way would not > > have this regression. > > Okay. Checked-in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-06/msg00084.html Thanks, Jan