From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13831 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2010 17:54:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 13822 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2010 17:54:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_XF,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:54:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o57Hsf03027619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:54:41 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o57HsdfQ032203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:54:40 -0400 Received: from greed.delorie.com (greed.delorie.com [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o57HsdF3012377; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:54:39 -0400 Received: (from dj@localhost) by greed.delorie.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o57Hsd0C012374; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 13:54:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:54:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201006071754.o57Hsd0C012374@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Nick Clifton CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Nick Clifton on Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:50:16 +0100) Subject: Re: RFA: RX Sim: Use unsigned masks when setting flag bits References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00178.txt.bz2 I wonder if the definition of b2mask[] should have "UL" on the 0xfffffff too ? It seems to work already though ;-) Otherwise, I think this patch is OK.