From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 512 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2010 16:24:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 502 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2010 16:24:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:24:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EDF2BAC5D; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:23:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0I8zjZTmXHUw; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:23:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D014C2BAC56; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:23:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6755EF58FA; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:24:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] new testcase: Internal error on unqualified name re-set (PR 11657) Message-ID: <20100602162354.GV3019@adacore.com> References: <20100602143233.GA22447@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201006021603.50479.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100602161218.GA31980@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100602161218.GA31980@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 > > > +gdb_breakpoint "main" > > > +gdb_run_cmd > > > +gdb_test "" "" "start" Would it be OK to use ".*" as the expected output? This makes it explicit that you expect some output, but just don't care what it is. This is relative to a question that MichaelS asked, because he's working on replacing uses of gdb_test where no output is expected. -- Joel