From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [rfc patch] nomem: internal_error -> error
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100601164808.GA22487@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
Hi,
unfortunately I see this problem reproducible only with the
archer-jankratochvil-vla branch (VLA = Variable Length Arrays - char[var]).
OTOH this branch I hopefully submit in some form for FSF GDB later.
In this case (a general problem but tested for example on Fedora 13 i686):
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
char a[argc];
return a[0];
}
(gdb) start
(gdb) print a
../../gdb/utils.c:1251: internal-error: virtual memory exhausted: can't allocate 4294951689 bytes.
It is apparently because boundary for the variable `a' is not initialized
there. Users notice it due to Eclipse-CDT trying to automatically display all
the local variables on each step.
Apparentl no regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora13-linux-gnu.
But is anone aware of the reasons to use internal_error there?
I find simple error as a perfectly reasonable there.
(history only tracks it since the initial import)
IIRC this idea has been discussed with Tom Tromey, not sure of its origin.
I understand it may be offtopic for FSF GDB but from some GDB crashes I am not
sure if it can happen only due to the VLA variables.
Thanks,
Jan
gdb/
2010-06-01 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* utils.c (nomem): Change internal_error to error.
--- a/gdb/utils.c
+++ b/gdb/utils.c
@@ -1265,15 +1265,9 @@ void
nomem (long size)
{
if (size > 0)
- {
- internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
- _("virtual memory exhausted: can't allocate %ld bytes."),
- size);
- }
+ error (_("virtual memory exhausted: can't allocate %ld bytes."), size);
else
- {
- internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, _("virtual memory exhausted."));
- }
+ error (_("virtual memory exhausted."));
}
/* The xmalloc() (libiberty.h) family of memory management routines.
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-01 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-01 16:48 Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2010-06-01 17:56 ` Mark Kettenis
2010-06-01 17:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100601164808.GA22487@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox