From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3544 invoked by alias); 27 May 2010 18:22:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 3530 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2010 18:22:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 May 2010 18:22:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 4496 invoked from network); 27 May 2010 18:22:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 27 May 2010 18:22:10 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: Michael Snyder Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb.trace/*.exp send_gdb vs. gdb_test Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:44:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-21-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Stan Shebs References: <4BFEB77D.4080107@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <4BFEB77D.4080107@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005271922.03831.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00645.txt.bz2 On Thursday 27 May 2010 19:18:37, Michael Snyder wrote: > This patch should get extra-thorough review and preferably be tested by > the tracepoint maintainers, since I wasn't able to test all of it. Did you test it against gdbserver x86 or x86_64? That should cover it: -- Pedro Alves