From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10297 invoked by alias); 25 May 2010 09:03:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 10163 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2010 09:03:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 09:03:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 27944 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 09:03:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO orlando.localnet) (pedro@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 25 May 2010 09:03:01 -0000 From: Pedro Alves To: =?utf-8?q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric_RISS?= Subject: Re: [commit] updated gnulib from latest git. Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:09:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-21-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <201005230240.12389.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201005242356.50701.pedro@codesourcery.com> <1274764467.1918.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1274764467.1918.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201005251002.33162.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00564.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 25 May 2010 06:14:27, Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric RISS wrote: > Le lundi 24 mai 2010 =C3=A0 23:56 +0100, Pedro Alves a =C3=A9crit : > > On Monday 24 May 2010 21:40:10, Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric RISS wrote: > > > I don't understand all the specifics, but it seems there is something > > > broken in this commit. The commit contains the followig hunk in > > > gdb/config.in: > > >=20 > > > -/* Number of bits in a file offset, on hosts where this is settable.= */ > > > -#undef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS > > > - > >=20 > > How bizarre. I don't know how that happened. Maybe I used the wrong > > version of autoconf/header. Just regenerating the file brought > > that back. > >=20 > > Thanks for finding and pointing this out. >=20 > Thanks. For the record, I tried regenerating these myself and I got yet > another version, but which also didn't contain the large file support. > What version of the autotools are you using, isn't it 2.64? It is. Pristine FSF 2.64 built from sources. --=20 Pedro Alves