From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-73195-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1128 invoked by alias); 21 May 2010 15:07:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 1119 invoked by uid 22791); 21 May 2010 15:07:38 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 15:07:34 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721DD2BAC14;	Fri, 21 May 2010 11:07:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with LMTP id XK-WPGgUhq-a; Fri, 21 May 2010 11:07:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])	by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4238E2BAC07;	Fri, 21 May 2010 11:07:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)	id 169C1F58FA; Fri, 21 May 2010 08:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 15:09:00 -0000
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix duplicate types for single DIE
Message-ID: <20100521150729.GS3019@adacore.com>
References: <20100513115029.GA27341@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100520233131.GN3019@adacore.com> <20100521093249.GA4719@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100521093249.GA4719@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2

> Therefore I find it more simple to just follow some paradigm than to think
> whether it is safe to violate it in that specific case.  Moreover I was not
> sure about this Ada descriptive types myself (which you have made clear now).
> Also the order does not matter IMO, code efficiency is the same.

I agree with you on all counts.

-- 
Joel