From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21627 invoked by alias); 21 May 2010 15:05:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 21565 invoked by uid 22791); 21 May 2010 15:05:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 15:05:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86F12BABF2; Fri, 21 May 2010 11:05:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04kKLGqn7I6L; Fri, 21 May 2010 11:05:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A162BAC14; Fri, 21 May 2010 11:05:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 78B63F58FA; Fri, 21 May 2010 08:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 15:06:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Joel Sherrill Cc: Doug Evans , Tiemen Schut , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [patch] sim/erc32/ max simulation time extended by using 64bit ints Message-ID: <20100521150529.GR3019@adacore.com> References: <4BD1BBE3020000520000FC62@pluto.sron.nl> <4BE08E95.5040500@oarcorp.com> <20100517015752.GA24402@adacore.com> <20100520231045.GL3019@adacore.com> <4BF67A0D.3020607@oarcorp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BF67A0D.3020607@oarcorp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00485.txt.bz2 > >> * sis.h: Remove #include. > >> (uint64, int64): Redefine without using stdint.h. > >> (UINT64_MAX): Define. > >FYI: I just checked that one in. > > > Doug do you still want that VAL -> strtol/ll change? Can you provide more info, which change is that? -- Joel