Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: msnyder@vmware.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] persistence of schedlock mode
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 19:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005121925.o4CJP9uR007227@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BEAEEB0.5040202@vmware.com> (message from Michael Snyder on	Wed, 12 May 2010 11:08:48 -0700)

> Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 11:08:48 -0700
> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
> 
> Bug 11580 points out a problem related to persistence of the
> scheduler locking mode.  If you set the mode to "on" (which
> means that only one thread can run), and then kill and restart
> your program, the mode persists and your program may deadlock.
> 
> I don't think this is a problem for mode "step", and it could
> be argued that mode "on" is "use at your own risk".  However
> I've been thinking about how to resolve it, and this simple
> but intrusive patch is what I come up with.
> 
> Comments?

Ah, that's clever.  The user will be notified, but doesn't have to
answer an additional question.

> Index: infrun.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/infrun.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.438
> diff -u -p -r1.438 infrun.c
> --- infrun.c	6 May 2010 19:14:08 -0000	1.438
> +++ infrun.c	12 May 2010 17:37:09 -0000
> @@ -1416,6 +1416,18 @@ set_schedlock_func (char *args, int from
>      }
>  }
>  
> +/* reset_schedlock -- public */
> + 
> +void
> +reset_schedlock ()
> +{
> +  if (scheduler_mode == schedlock_on)
> +    {
> +      warning ("Resetting scheduler-lock mode to 'off'");
> +      scheduler_mode = schedlock_off;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  /* True if execution commands resume all threads of all processes by
>     default; otherwise, resume only threads of the current inferior
>     process.  */
> Index: target.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/target.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.250
> diff -u -p -r1.250 target.c
> --- target.c	6 May 2010 22:29:49 -0000	1.250
> +++ target.c	12 May 2010 17:37:09 -0000
> @@ -2231,6 +2231,10 @@ void
>  target_mourn_inferior (void)
>  {
>    struct target_ops *t;
> +
> +  /* Clear schedlock in infrun.c */
> +  reset_schedlock ();
> +
>    for (t = current_target.beneath; t != NULL; t = t->beneath)
>      {
>        if (t->to_mourn_inferior != NULL)	


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-12 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-12 18:08 Michael Snyder
2010-05-12 19:25 ` Pedro Alves
2010-05-12 19:49 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2010-05-17 10:33 ` Pierre Muller
2010-05-17 15:29   ` Joel Brobecker
2010-05-17 17:34     ` Michael Snyder
2010-05-17 13:20 ` Nathan Froyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201005121925.o4CJP9uR007227@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox