From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 829 invoked by alias); 7 May 2010 17:03:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 741 invoked by uid 22791); 7 May 2010 17:03:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 May 2010 17:03:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o47H32RA023722 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 13:03:03 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o47H2uIl017443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 May 2010 13:02:58 -0400 Received: from host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o47H2uJc024281; Fri, 7 May 2010 19:02:56 +0200 Received: (from jkratoch@localhost) by host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o47H2t9V024280; Fri, 7 May 2010 19:02:55 +0200 Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 17:03:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix dwarf2read to crash again Message-ID: <20100507170255.GA24098@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> References: <20100421091303.GA19378@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:50:54 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > The above is why I think this patch should no go in as-is. > I am interested in reactions to the above. I share your opinion dwarf2read.c could properly handle buggy DWARF content. Currenly is it at least OK to check-in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-modula2-self-type.exp? It PASSes on any recent GDBs. Thanks, Jan