From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18659 invoked by alias); 6 May 2010 18:10:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 18651 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2010 18:10:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 May 2010 18:10:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFEB2BAB21; Thu, 6 May 2010 14:10:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3Gfe7ANy5g51; Thu, 6 May 2010 14:10:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875622BAAE7; Thu, 6 May 2010 14:10:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3999EF58F9; Thu, 6 May 2010 11:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 18:10:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pierre Muller Cc: 'Stan Shebs' , 'Pedro Alves' , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ARI] Remove all editCase warnings Message-ID: <20100506181032.GX2768@adacore.com> References: <005b01caebe1$2183b890$648b29b0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <201005050044.28991.pedro@codesourcery.com> <000901caec31$d109e640$731db2c0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <201005051611.09790.pedro@codesourcery.com> <000001caec6d$59194860$0b4bd920$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20100505165529.GO2768@adacore.com> <4BE1A7BA.9000803@codesourcery.com> <002a01caec96$4f7e3080$ee7a9180$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002a01caec96$4f7e3080$ee7a9180$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00152.txt.bz2 > Eliminating the ' (' in the pattern would probably lead to lots of > false positive. I didn't realize that the ARI depended on that. We may have a few functions in ada-* whose name is so long that the ( is on the next line. To be double-checked. > I don't know what to think now... I think everyone agrees that the benefits of having this rule are very small. I would say that we've spent enough energy trying to accomodate it, and it's time for it to go... -- Joel