From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31272 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2010 16:13:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31203 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2010 16:13:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:13:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3TGD5eC032349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:13:06 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3TGCqKf000666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:13:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:13:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com Subject: Re: [python][patch] Add GDB Parameters functionality Message-ID: <20100429161252.GA21754@localhost.localdomain> References: <83wrvsyelz.fsf@gnu.org> <4BD73A07.7020706@redhat.com> <83r5m0y9fp.fsf@gnu.org> <4BD7438F.8030508@redhat.com> <83pr1kxoyn.fsf@gnu.org> <4BD7D58B.9020007@redhat.com> <4BD7FD3E.5000802@redhat.com> <83fx2fxzut.fsf@gnu.org> <4BD89B18.9040403@redhat.com> <83bpd3x8iv.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83bpd3x8iv.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00958.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 06:06:00AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Thanks for looking at it. I've included a modified patch encompassing > > all of the requested changes. Is this OK? > > Yes, thanks. On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:09:45PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > Thanks. The updated patch is ok provided the new .exp runs without any > fails. So committed. Thanks for the reviews. Cheers, Phil