From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-72378-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29277 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2010 19:56:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 29260 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Apr 2010 19:56:13 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,TW_CP,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:56:05 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3LJtWZe011012; 	Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:55:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o3LJtV69021551; 	Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:55:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:56:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201004211955.o3LJtV69021551@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: vapier@gentoo.org
CC: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <201004211540.44433.vapier@gentoo.org> (message from Mike 	Frysinger on Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:40:43 -0400)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: workaround sparc memcpy fortify error
References: <1268964549-30380-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20100421160141.GB19194@adacore.com> <201004211608.o3LG8rNo016697@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <201004211540.44433.vapier@gentoo.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00697.txt.bz2

> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:40:43 -0400
> 
> On Wednesday 21 April 2010 12:08:54 Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > It was a ping for
> > > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gdb.patches/56350
> > >=20
> > > Aha - Mark Kettenis seemed to be OK with this, since he's the one
> > > who suggested it. Mark, is this patch still OK?
> >=20
> > Hmm, can we keep the existing gdb_assert() and just add the len <=3D 8
> > one?  With that change, this is fine with me.
> 
> fine by me.  i can also add a comment about the gcc PR if people want.

Nah, I don't think that's really necessary in this case.